Mais uma vez, concordo com o Hitchens
In matters of foreign policy, it has been proved time and again, the Clintons are devoted to no interest other than their own. A president absolutely has to know of his chief foreign-policy executive that he or she has no other agenda than the one he has set. Who can say with a straight face that this is true of a woman whose personal ambition is without limit; whose second loyalty is to an impeached and disbarred and discredited former president; and who is ready at any moment, and on government time, to take a wheedling call from either of her bulbous brothers? This is also the unscrupulous female who until recently was willing to play the race card on President-elect Obama and (in spite of her own complete want of any foreign-policy qualifications) to ridicule him for lacking what she only knew about by way of sordid backstairs dealing. What may look like wound-healing and magnanimity to some looks like foolhardiness and masochism to me.
A razao pro Obama ter sido o candidato democrata foram discordancias claras em politica externa com a Hillary. Agora, a Hillary pode ser secretaria de Estado? Me desculpem, mas isso nao faz O MENOR sentido na minha cabeca.
Materia inteira, aqui.
Em tempo, dia desses o Satanaldo falou que era parecido com o Hitchens…
Ou que ele e o Hitchens pensavam parecido.
Quem nasceu para ser Satanaldo nunca chega a Hitchens, assim como quem nasceu para ser Jabor nunca chega a Paulo Francis.